Prove you can stay within tolerance.
Regulators want more than a plan. They want evidence that you can keep important business services running through severe disruption. iluminr turns impact tolerances into tested, defensible practice.
What you're up against.
Mapping is just the start
Identifying important business services and setting impact tolerances is required. Proving you can stay within them is the hard part.
Dependencies you do not control
Critical third and fourth parties sit inside your services, often invisibly.
Testing that has to recur
Resilience is judged continuously. A one-off exercise does not satisfy the expectation.
Practice, built for this.
Test severe but plausible disruption
Microsimulations run your teams through the scenarios regulators expect you to withstand.
Validate impact tolerances
See whether your services really stay within tolerance when a dependency fails.
Evidence on demand
Produce defensible proof of testing for DORA, APRA CPS 230, and the UK regime.
Scenarios your teams can run.
Critical supplier outage
A provider behind an important service goes dark. Failover, communication, and tolerance decisions follow.
Payment rail failure
A core payment service degrades. The clock against your impact tolerance starts.
Foundation-model disruption
A model behind a customer service shifts behaviour with no notice.
Data centre loss
A site or region fails. Recovery and continuity decisions land in parallel.
Evidence in the shape audits expect.
What you walk away with.
Tolerances proven
Evidence that important services stay within impact tolerances under stress.
Audit-ready evidence
Defensible records shaped for your regulators.
Continuous assurance
Capability Intelligence keeps proof current between formal exercises.
Common questions.
Practice is the new proof.
See it in your world.
See iluminr in action