Two Years Running: Gartner spotlights Microsimulations in the Hype Cycle for Legal, Risk, Compliance and Audit Technologies (2024 & 2025)
COMPLIANCE & REGULATION

The Global Regulatory Landscape

45+ regulations and standards across five tiers - every one converging on the same demand: prove your resilience through tested, evidenced scenario exercises. Filter the universe below, and open any framework for detail.

The Regulatory Universe

45+ frameworks. Five tiers. One evidence layer.

Region
Obligation
45 frameworks of 45
Tier 1 Explicit scenario-testing requirements

Regulations that name scenario exercises, tabletops, or BCM/DR testing as a direct obligation.

Regulation / Standard GeographyRequirementTesting TypeCadence
EU DORA
European Union
Yes (TLPT)
Scenario, TLPT
Annual + 3yr TLPT
FCA / PRA Op Resilience
United Kingdom
Yes
Scenario, simulation
Regular / ongoing
SAMA Cyber Security Framework
Saudi Arabia
Yes
IR exercise, crisis sim
Annual minimum
APRA CPS 230
Australia
Yes
BCM exercise, scenario
Annual minimum
SEC Regulation SCI
United States
Yes
Functional / perf test
Annual minimum
HKMA CR
Hong Kong
Yes
Cyber-resilience testing
Regular cycles
OSFI Op Risk & Resilience
Canada
Yes
Scenario-based
Risk-proportionate
OSFI B-13
Canada
Yes
DR scenario testing
Periodic
RBI Cyber Security Framework
India
Yes
Pen test, crisis exercise
Periodic
EBA ICT & Security Risk Mgmt
European Union
Yes
BCM test, disruption sim
Regular / supervisory
ECB CROE
EU / ECB
Yes
Cyber scenario exercise
Supervisory cycles
UAE Central Bank IS Regulation
United Arab Emirates
Yes
Cybersecurity exercises
Examination-based
Australia SOCI Act
Australia
Yes
CRMP testing
Program-based
EBA Outsourcing Guidelines
European Union
Yes
3rd party disruption test
Material outsourcing
Singapore Cybersecurity Act
Singapore
Yes
Audit, response exercises
Regular / directed
UAE Information Assurance Stds
United Arab Emirates
Yes
IR test, cyber drills
Regular / compliance
Israel INCD Cyber Methodology
Israel
Yes
Cyber incident simulation
Regular national cycles
Tier 2 Testing-adjacent expectations

Rules that require tested, demonstrated resilience without prescribing scenario-testing by name.

Regulation / Standard GeographyRequirementTesting TypeCadence
NIS2 + IR 2024/2690
European Union
Indirect
BCM / DR testing
Planned intervals
MAS BCM Guidelines
Singapore
Indirect
Comprehensive testing
Regular
MAS TRM Guidelines
Singapore
Indirect
Adversarial simulation
Risk-proportionate
FFIEC BCM Guidance
United States
Indirect
BCP testing program
Periodic
Basel Committee Op Resilience
Global (BCBS)
Indirect
Scenario-based testing
Principles-based
Tier 3 Threat-led & intelligence-led frameworks

Advanced, intelligence-led red-team testing of critical live systems - increasingly the global benchmark.

Regulation / Standard GeographyRequirementTesting TypeCadence
TIBER-EU
EU / ECB
Yes (TLPT)
Intel-led red team
Bespoke / periodic
CBEST
United Kingdom
Yes (TLPT)
Threat-led pentest
Periodic
OSFI I-CRT
Canada
Yes (TLPT)
Intel-led test
Bespoke / periodic
HKMA iCAST
Hong Kong
Yes (TLPT)
Intel-led simulation
Tier 1 institutions
APRA Intel-Led Cyber Testing
Australia
Yes
Intel-led simulation
Risk-proportionate
Tier 4 Standards layer - ISO & NIST

The ISO and NIST standards that tell practitioners how to design, run, and evidence scenario tests.

Regulation / Standard GeographyRequirementTesting TypeCadence
ISO 22398
International
Standard
Exercise design
Program-based
ISO 22301
International
Standard
BCM exercise
Program-based
ISO 22320
International
Standard
Crisis mgmt exercise
Program-based
ISO 22316
International
Standard
Resilience assessment
Program-based
ISO 22350
International
Standard
Crisis mgmt exercise
Program-based
ISO 27035
International
Standard
IR exercise
Program-based
NIST CSF 2.0
United States
Standard
Respond / Recover
Program-based
NIST SP 800-84
United States
Standard
TTX programs
Annual (800-53 req)
NIST SP 800-61r3
United States
Standard
IR exercises
Program-based
NIST SP 800-53
United States
Standard
IR exercises
Program-based
NIST SP 800-53 (CP / IR)
United States
Standard
CP / IR testing
Annual (control req)
CPMI-IOSCO Cyber Resilience
International (FMI)
Indirect
FMI resilience testing
Supervisory
Tier 5 National infrastructure & FMI frameworks

Large-scale national programmes that treat infrastructure resilience at sector or system level.

Regulation / Standard GeographyRequirementTesting TypeCadence
Cyber Storm Program
United States (CISA)
Yes
National-scale simulation
Biennial
Cyber Europe Program
EU (ENISA)
Yes
Cross-border cyber exercise
Biennial
US NIPP
United States
Indirect
Sector exercise programs
Program cadence
No frameworks match those filters.
Landscape compiled from publicly available regulatory and standards materials. Always confirm current obligations with your compliance function or counsel.
The Common Thread

What every regulator is actually asking for

Strip away the geography and the framework names, and the underlying capability demands converge on six things.

Continuity under disruption

Operate through severe-but-plausible events without breaching tolerance thresholds.

Response & recovery readiness

Demonstrate tested capability to detect, contain, and recover from major incidents.

Third-party disruption preparedness

Critical service provider failures tested as scenarios - not assumed to be managed contractually.

Crisis communications

Internal escalation and external notification pathways validated under realistic pressure.

Testing discipline & cadence

Documented testing programs with defined frequency, scope, assumptions, and participants.

Remediation based on findings

Evidence that gaps identified in exercises are tracked, prioritised, and closed.

Trusted worldwide by organizations of all sizes